Introduction
Buddhahood (Sanskrit: buddhatva) refers to the supreme and complete realization of enlightenment, attained by a Buddha. It represents the final goal of Buddhist practice: the total liberation from all mental defilements and ignorance, and the direct and unimpeded insight into ultimate reality. Buddhas are beings who, having fully awakened to the nature of existence, embody wisdom (prajñā), compassion (karuṇā), and skillful means (upāya-kauśalya) to guide other beings to liberation. While Theravāda Buddhism emphasizes the historical Buddha Śākyamuni as the unique fully enlightened being of our era, Mahāyāna Buddhism holds that buddhahood is attainable by all beings and that innumerable Buddhas exist throughout the cosmos.
1. Characteristics of Buddhahood
Early Buddhist texts ascribe to the Buddha a set of extraordinary qualities that distinguish him from arhats and other awakened beings:
- Ten powers (daşabala): Complete knowledge of all conditions and realities.
- Four fearlessnesses: Absolute confidence in teaching and guiding others.
- Threefold knowledge: Understanding of past lives, karmic consequences, and liberation.
- Thirty-two major and eighty minor physical marks (mahāpuruṣa-lakṫṛāḥaṣa): Visible signs of perfection.
- Supernatural abilities (ṛiddhi): Such as bilocation, mind-reading, and cosmic vision.
These traits reflect the fruition of immense merit and wisdom accumulated over countless lifetimes of Bodhisattva practice. The Buddha is viewed not only as a teacher but as the embodiment of the Dharma itself.
2. The Buddha Bodies (Trikāya)
The doctrine of the three bodies of the Buddha, or Trikāya, developed over time, especially in Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna Buddhism. The concept serves to explain how Buddhas can transcend the limitations of physicality and remain active in the world for the benefit of sentient beings.
2.1. Dharma Body (Dharmakāya)
The Dharmakāya represents the Buddha’s embodiment of truth and ultimate reality (dharmatā). It is beyond form and duality, expressing the enlightened mind’s intrinsic purity and omniscience. It is also seen as the foundation from which all other Buddha manifestations arise. In some Mahāyāna texts, it is synonymous with Buddha nature (tathāgatagarbha).
2.2. Enjoyment Body (Saṃbhogakāya)
This refers to the celestial form of a Buddha that resides in a pure land, accessible only to highly advanced Bodhisattvas. It is the perfect expression of the Buddha’s blissful experience of the Dharma, used to teach and interact with other awakened beings. Examples include Amitābha in Sukhāvatī and Akṣobhya in Abhirati.
2.3. Emanation Body (Nirmāṇakāya)
The Nirmāṇakāya is the physical or manifested body of the Buddha that appears in the world. Śākyamuni Buddha, who lived and taught in historical India, is understood as such an emanation. However, in Mahāyāna doctrine, any being or phenomenon that inspires realization may be considered a nirmāṇakāya.
3. The Unrestricted Nirvāṇa of the Buddhas
In early Mahāyāna texts such as the Prajñāpāramitā sūtras, the concept of unrestricted nirvāṇa (apratiṣṭhita-nirvāṇa) emerged. This refers to the idea that Buddhas do not enter into a static, withdrawn state after attaining enlightenment. Instead, they continue to engage actively with the world in spontaneous, compassionate activity. Here, saṃsāra and nirvāṇa are not viewed as opposites but as inseparable aspects of reality.
4. Cosmic Buddhology and Pure Lands
Mahāyāna cosmology envisions an infinite number of Buddhas operating in countless Buddha-fields (buddhakṣetra), or pure lands. Each Buddha is said to purify his field through vast accumulations of merit and wisdom to provide optimal conditions for beings to realize the Dharma.
Notable examples include:
- Amitābha Buddha: Lord of the Western Pure Land (Sukhāvatī), accessible through faith and nembutsu recitation.
- Akṣobhya Buddha: Lord of the Eastern Pure Land (Abhirati), symbolizing immovability.
Pure lands are seen not merely as realms of rebirth but as pedagogical environments for swift progress to enlightenment.
5. Buddha Nature and Path Models
Mahāyāna developed two distinct models for attaining Buddhahood:
- Transformational model: As seen in Yogācāra and Madhyamaka, wherein one’s deluded consciousness is gradually transformed into the wisdom and qualities of the Buddha.
- Discovery model: Rooted in tathāgatagarbha theory, it holds that all beings already possess Buddha nature, and the path consists of removing obscurations to reveal this innate purity.
These two perspectives are integrated in many schools, such as in Tibetan Vajrayāna, where tantric practices harness the energy of body, speech, and mind to realize their inherent identity with the three Buddha bodies.
6. Tantric and Esoteric Interpretations
Vajrayāna Buddhism builds upon the Trikāya doctrine by introducing a fourth body:
- Sahajakāya or Mahāsukhakāya: The embodiment of co-emergent bliss and wisdom realized through advanced tantric yogic practices.
In tantra, practitioners identify their body, speech, and mind with the Buddhas’ through rituals, mantras, and meditative visualization. Mandalas serve as maps of this transformation, with each Buddha occupying a cardinal direction and symbolizing an aspect of enlightened mind.
7. Contemporary Interpretations
In Pure Land Buddhism, especially in Japanese traditions such as Jōdoshū and Jōdo Shinshū, the power of the Buddha, especially Amitābha, is seen as essential for liberation during the age of Dharma decline (mappō). Salvation is achieved not through one’s own effort but through entrusting oneself to the Buddha’s vow and name.
Zen traditions, in contrast, emphasize immediate and immanent realization of Buddhahood. Through meditation and direct insight, one is said to uncover the Buddha nature already present. As Zen master Hakuin Ekaku declared: “This very place, the pure lotus land; this very body, the Buddha body.”
Bibliography
Griffiths, Paul J. On Being Buddha: The Classical Doctrine of Buddhahood. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
La Vallée Poussin, Louis de, trans. and ed. Vijñaptimātratā Siddhi: La Siddhi de Hiuan-tsang. Paris: Geuthner, 1928–1948.
Makransky, John J. Buddhahood Embodied: Sources of Controversy in India and Tibet. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
Nagao, Gadjin. “On the Theory of Buddha-Body (Buddhakāya).” In Mādhyamika and Yogācāra: A Study of Mahāyāna Philosophies, Collected Papers of G. M. Nagao, edited by Leslie S. Kawamura. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.
Reynolds, Frank. “The Several Bodies of Buddha: Reflections on a Neglected Aspect of Theravāda Tradition.” History of Religions 16, no. 4 (1977): 374–389.
Reynolds, Frank E., and Charles Hallisey. “The Buddha.” In Buddhism and Asian History, edited by Joseph M. Kitagawa and Mark D. Cummings. New York: Macmillan, 1989.
Sharf, Robert H. Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.
Snellgrove, David. Indo-Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Shambhala, 1987.
Strong, John S. The Legend of King Aśoka: A Study and Translation of the Aśokāvadāna. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.
Williams, Paul. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. New York: Routledge, 1989.
OpenBuddha 
Leave a comment